网络覆盖范围列表,包括空的两个

目前有哪些网络提供优惠,每一个网络有多少?

目前,11个网络提供活跃的报价,而该列表的顶部和底部之间的差距很大.BreiP拥有7.574个报价,这是唯一最大的份额,Hotmart的关联公司接近6.600个,基维Fy4.890个.

其他八个网络分开了其余的不均. Hotmart 属于 Hotmart 关联公司,拥有2,586个报价,Admitad 2,120,Monetizze 1,599和 ClickBank 1,393.CPALead,BuyGoods,MyLead和dr.cash 关闭了列表,分别为755,443,50和32个报价,仍然活跃,仍然可以过,只是更薄.

哪些网络已配置,但目前是空的?

截至2026-08-05的计数,Digistore24和TerraLeads是两个配置的集成,零报价.这两个都出现在基础网络表中,与携带库存的11个一起,这意味着连接存在于系统中,尽管目前没有报价流过它.

对于读者来说,这很重要,因为一个没有任何报价的网络不是一个谣言或一个占位的标志,而是一个真正的集成,等待数据,

为什么要发布一个没有回报的集成?

发布一个没有回报的集成看起来像一个糟糕的决定,而且这个位的大多数运营商会告诉你隐藏它.本能是,在任何公开列表中,

That instinct gets the incentive backwards once you compare it against how the ad-spy category actually discloses pricing and coverage. BigSpy runs five named plans but only publishes figures for two of them, leaving Basic, Group Buy and Enterprise quote-gated with no number attached anywhere on its own site. AdPlexity lists Social as a sixth product on its pricing page with no price shown next to it, a gap that needed flagging rather than filling. Naming Digistore24 and TerraLeads as zero is the same kind of disclosure those pages avoid, just pointed at the reader instead of away from them.

哪些网络是生产者平台,哪些是CPA网络?

The eleven networks split roughly into two business models, producer or creator marketplaces and traditional CPA or affiliate networks, and the two behave differently for a media buyer. Hotmart, Hotmart Affiliation, Braip, Kiwify and Monetizze are Brazilian and broader LATAM producer platforms, where a creator lists a digital product and an affiliate marketplace layer sits on top of it, blurring the line an affiliate network vs affiliate program comparison usually draws cleanly. That structure is part of why those five names alone account for more than 21,000 of the catalogue's offers.

ClickBank, BuyGoods, CPALead, MyLead, dr.cash and Admitad read closer to conventional affiliate or CPA networks, where the offer owner and the network are separate parties from the start. The distinction matters before you pick one to test: a side-by-side affiliate network comparison treats producer marketplaces and CPA networks as different categories with different approval processes, not interchangeable rows on one table.

网络覆盖实际上意味着什么?

报价仅仅仅在其状态活跃的情况下才会计,并且在此基础线之外,目录会跟踪是否包含数值CPA数量,地理目标和登陆URL,这三个字段使支付和地理位置可以过而不是埋在广告副本中的索赔.

在28042个报价中,有25293个报价至少包含一个地质目标,25085个报价包含着着着陆URL,所以地理位置和目的地接近于通用.支付数据较薄:15582个报价包含数值CPA金额,这意味着大量的目录仍然需要打开报价以找到支付.编辑深度更薄:8,668个报价包含300+字符的长描述,632个包含一个短的,18742个没有.

Freshness is the sharpest limit of all: only 274 of the 28,042 offers were re-confirmed by a scrape in the last 30 days. Treat every count on this page as a structural map of what the catalogue covers, not a promise that any individual offer's terms updated this week. A reader comparing where to list a supplement offer should still verify commission and geo terms directly with the network before committing budget.

这一列表与广告工具的比较是什么?

Every ad-spy competitor in this category indexes ads, not offers, and that is the structural line this list sits on one side of. AdSpy, AdPlexity, Anstrex, BigSpy, PowerAdSpy, Minea, Dropispy, Foreplay, AdHeart, PiPiADS and Atria, eleven tools researched, each builds a searchable database of ad creatives. None of them publishes a catalogue of affiliate offers with payout, vertical and geo as first-class filterable records the way this network list does.

AdSpy and AdPlexity come closest, letting a user filter ads by affiliate network or by Offer ID, but that is still a filter layered onto an ad-creative index, not an offer catalogue in its own right. More striking is who these eleven skip entirely: not one names Hotmart, Braip, Kiwify or Monetizze anywhere in its stated coverage, and those four networks alone supply 21,650 of the 28,042 offers here.

None of that should be read as an ad-volume claim, because on raw ad count this catalogue is smaller by orders of magnitude. AdSpy's own homepage counters claim 208.2 million ads and BigSpy claims over 1 billion creatives, against this catalogue's 4,296 ads. The two numbers answer different questions, offer coverage against ad volume, and conflating them would misstate what either side actually built.

如果接下来集成,哪些网络会增加最多?

诚实答案是,两个最大的短期收益已经在系统中处于零状态:Digistore24和TerraLeads. 两者都是配置集成,完成任何一个都增加了库存,而无需全新的连接器的工程成本,尽管精确的量都会有助于检查需要一旦同步运行而不是仅仅从声誉中假定.

除了这两个,真正的差距在于尚未配置的网络,这页面不会猜测它无法对现场来源进行检查的名称或量.任何添加应根据已经对Digistore24和TerraLeads的相同门进行判断:一个工作集成在推出单一的报价之前就值得命名,付款完整性就像网络宽度一样重要,这也是为什么每周付款结构 值得通过网络检查而不是假设是统一的原因.

如何要求网络?

Send the network name and the vertical it serves to the research desk through the standard contact channel on this site, and note whether you already hold an active account there. A network already carrying inventory elsewhere, one you would otherwise weigh through a direct advertiser vs affiliate network comparison, is easier to prioritize than a cold request with no offer volume attached.

要求与本页面已经适用于本身的标准进行权衡:一个网络值得添加,只要它能够携带真正的报价数量,而不是仅仅是标志.

快速决策检查列表

实际问题是,读者是否需要更快的证据来了解已经在VSL驱动的直接反应中发挥作用,特别是在营养品,补充剂,GLP-1,减肥,血糖以及相邻的高意向健康市场上.

对于下一个决定,最重要的是根据市场活动的例子:哪个子要测试,哪个索赔风格有风险,哪个道结构是常见的,哪个语言市场正在移动,以及竞争对手的创意是否可能是早期,扩展或已经和.

• 如果您需要直接答案,请从TL;DR开始.
• 快速比较交易.
• 使用常见问题,以提供答案机准备的总结.
• 根据该决定,使用CTA,而不是理论,需要实时VSL和广告示例.

报道报道报道报道报道报道报道报道报道报道报道报道

广告客户在视觉创意之外所做的事情理解的环境,包括广告客户在黑帽,灰帽和白帽广告模式中,具有足够的背景.实际的区别是,用户不仅看到屏幕截图;他们正在看到VSL,广告,道,转录,UTM文本和将资产转化为决定的研究笔记.

这很重要,因为直接响应的附属公司并不属于一个清洁类别.减肥活动可能使用白帽合规广告,灰帽预登陆器,更具侵略性的VSL和围绕上和恢复设计的收购路径.有用的智能平台需要捕获这种频谱,而不是假装每一次获胜的活动都像公共品牌广告.

黑帽,白帽和多语言信号覆盖

每日英特尔在黑帽和白帽式运动中追踪模式,以便运营商能够理解市场而不盲目复制风险.白帽的例子有助于耐用性和合规性审查;黑帽和灰帽的例子揭示了压力点,子,机制和道结构,这些机制可能会推动支出,但需要在使用前仔细适应.

该目录也为全球运营商构建,VSL和广告引用涵盖14多种语言和不同的当地语法.这对于巴西,拉塔姆,欧洲,MENA,印度和非原生英语附属公司来说是一个关键优势,他们需要看到市场的相同愿望如何跨文化转化,而不是仅仅研究美国英语广告.

如何负责任地使用情报

目标是建模,而不是复制. 使用每日英特尔来了解结构:,机制,证明,要求强度,深度,提供经济学和和阶段.然后构建原创创意,审查要求,并适应角度流量来源,国家,语言和合规要求的竞选.

强大的工作流程在行动之前比较多个例子.如果同一机制在多种语言,多种广告商和多种道变体中出现,它可能是持久的市场信号.如果这个例子只出现一次或依赖于攻击性索赔,请把它视为研究线索而不是竞选模板.

• 模型结构,而不是保护的创意资产.
• 单独的白帽耐用性与黑帽说服压力.
• 比较美国英语的例子与拉塔姆,欧洲和其他语言变体.
• 通过转录和接笔来构建原始简单.
• 保持合规性审查与市场研究分开.

方法论与来源背景

Daily Intel pages are written from a research workflow that reviews active VSLs, Meta ad creatives, transcripts, UTMs, funnel paths, checkout steps, upsells, recovery sequences, and compliance-sensitive claim patterns. The goal is to explain observable market behavior, not to provide legal, medical, or platform policy advice.

For external context, readers should compare advertising and research decisions against authoritative primary references such as Meta Ad Library, Google helpful content guidance, and Google SEO link best practices. Daily Intel adds the proprietary direct-response layer: blackhat, greyhat, and whitehat campaign pattern comparison across VSL-heavy niches and 14+ language markets.

For deeper evaluation, continue through The Numbers We Publish That Do Not Flatter Us, Where This Sits in a Stack That Already Has an Ad Spy Tool, What This Is Not: Six Things We Don't Do, How Fresh the Catalogue Actually Is — the Uncomfortable Answer, Best ad spy tools for direct response affiliates, and Best $50/month affiliate tool stack. These related Daily Intel pages connect this topic to the relevant methodology, pricing, trust context, comparison path, or niche workflow.