The Network Coverage List, Including the Two That Are Empty

which networks currently carry offers and how many each?

Eleven networks currently supply the catalogue with active offers, and the gap between the top and bottom of that list is wide. Braip carries 7,574 offers, the single largest slice, with Hotmart Affiliation close behind at 6,600 and Kiwify at 4,890. Together those three account for more than two-thirds of the entire 28,042-offer catalogue.

The remaining eight networks split the rest unevenly. Hotmart proper, a separate integration from Hotmart Affiliation, holds 2,586 offers, Admitad 2,120, Monetizze 1,599 and ClickBank 1,393. CPALead, BuyGoods, MyLead and dr.cash close out the list at 755, 443, 50 and 32 offers respectively, still active and still filterable, just thinner.

which networks are configured but currently empty?

Digistore24 and TerraLeads are the two configured integrations with zero offers as of the 2026-08-05 count. Both appear in the underlying network table alongside the eleven that carry inventory, meaning the connection exists in the system even though no offer currently flows through it.

That distinction matters for a reader deciding where to spend research time. A network with zero offers is not a rumor or a placeholder logo; it is a real integration waiting on data, and the difference between 'not built yet' and 'built, empty right now' is worth stating plainly rather than folding both into a vague promise of more networks coming soon.

why publish an integration that returns nothing?

Publishing an integration that returns nothing looks, at first glance, like a bad decision, and most operators in this niche would tell you to hide it. The instinct is to quietly drop the empty rows from any public list until they have offers to show, on the theory that a zero looks worse than no mention at all.

That instinct gets the incentive backwards once you compare it against how the ad-spy category actually discloses pricing and coverage. BigSpy runs five named plans but only publishes figures for two of them, leaving Basic, Group Buy and Enterprise quote-gated with no number attached anywhere on its own site. AdPlexity lists Social as a sixth product on its pricing page with no price shown next to it, a gap that needed flagging rather than filling. Naming Digistore24 and TerraLeads as zero is the same kind of disclosure those pages avoid, just pointed at the reader instead of away from them.

which networks are producer platforms and which are cpa networks?

The eleven networks split roughly into two business models, producer or creator marketplaces and traditional CPA or affiliate networks, and the two behave differently for a media buyer. Hotmart, Hotmart Affiliation, Braip, Kiwify and Monetizze are Brazilian and broader LATAM producer platforms, where a creator lists a digital product and an affiliate marketplace layer sits on top of it, blurring the line an affiliate network vs affiliate program comparison usually draws cleanly. That structure is part of why those five names alone account for more than 21,000 of the catalogue's offers.

ClickBank, BuyGoods, CPALead, MyLead, dr.cash and Admitad read closer to conventional affiliate or CPA networks, where the offer owner and the network are separate parties from the start. The distinction matters before you pick one to test: a side-by-side affiliate network comparison treats producer marketplaces and CPA networks as different categories with different approval processes, not interchangeable rows on one table.

what does coverage of a network actually mean here?

Coverage here means a structured record, not a mention. An offer counts only if its status is active, and beyond that baseline the catalogue tracks whether it carries a numeric CPA amount, a geo target and a landing URL, the three fields that make payout and geography filterable instead of claims buried in ad copy.

Of the 28,042 offers, 25,293 carry at least one geo target and 25,085 carry a landing URL, so geography and destination are close to universal. Payout data is thinner: 15,582 offers carry a numeric CPA amount, meaning a sizable share of the catalogue still requires opening the offer to find the payout. Editorial depth is thinner still: 8,668 offers carry a long description of 300+ characters, 632 carry a short one, and 18,742 carry none.

Freshness is the sharpest limit of all: only 274 of the 28,042 offers were re-confirmed by a scrape in the last 30 days. Treat every count on this page as a structural map of what the catalogue covers, not a promise that any individual offer's terms updated this week. A reader comparing where to list a supplement offer should still verify commission and geo terms directly with the network before committing budget.

how does this list compare with what ad tools cover?

Every ad-spy competitor in this category indexes ads, not offers, and that is the structural line this list sits on one side of. AdSpy, AdPlexity, Anstrex, BigSpy, PowerAdSpy, Minea, Dropispy, Foreplay, AdHeart, PiPiADS and Atria, eleven tools researched, each builds a searchable database of ad creatives. None of them publishes a catalogue of affiliate offers with payout, vertical and geo as first-class filterable records the way this network list does.

AdSpy and AdPlexity come closest, letting a user filter ads by affiliate network or by Offer ID, but that is still a filter layered onto an ad-creative index, not an offer catalogue in its own right. More striking is who these eleven skip entirely: not one names Hotmart, Braip, Kiwify or Monetizze anywhere in its stated coverage, and those four networks alone supply 21,650 of the 28,042 offers here.

None of that should be read as an ad-volume claim, because on raw ad count this catalogue is smaller by orders of magnitude. AdSpy's own homepage counters claim 208.2 million ads and BigSpy claims over 1 billion creatives, against this catalogue's 4,296 ads. The two numbers answer different questions, offer coverage against ad volume, and conflating them would misstate what either side actually built.

which networks would add the most if integrated next?

The honest answer is that the two biggest near-term gains are already sitting in the system at zero: Digistore24 and TerraLeads. Both are configured integrations, and completing either one adds inventory without the engineering cost of a brand-new connector, though the exact volume either would contribute needs checking once the sync runs rather than assumed from reputation alone.

Beyond those two, the real gap is in networks not yet configured at all, and this page will not guess at names or volumes it cannot check against a live source. Any addition should be judged against the same threshold already applied to Digistore24 and TerraLeads: a working integration is worth naming even before it carries a single offer, and payout completeness matters as much as network breadth, which is part of why weekly-payment structures are worth checking network by network rather than assumed to be uniform.

how do you request a network?

Send the network name and the vertical it serves to the research desk through the standard contact channel on this site, and note whether you already hold an active account there. A network already carrying inventory elsewhere, one you would otherwise weigh through a direct advertiser vs affiliate network comparison, is easier to prioritize than a cold request with no offer volume attached.

Requests get weighed against the same standard this page already applies to itself: a network is worth adding once it can carry real offer counts, not just a logo. Digistore24 and TerraLeads are the proof that 'configured' and 'covered' are two different claims, and any new request joins that same queue rather than skipping to the front of it.

Quick decision checklist

Use this page as a decision aid, not a generic blog post. The practical question is whether the reader needs faster evidence about what is already working in VSL-driven direct response, especially across nutra, supplements, GLP-1, weight loss, blood sugar, and adjacent high-intent health markets.

Daily Intel Service is most relevant when the next decision depends on active market examples: which hook to test, which claim style is risky, which funnel structure is common, which language market is moving, and whether a competitor's creative is likely early, scaling, or already saturated.

• Start with the TL;DR if you need the direct answer.
• Use the table to compare trade-offs quickly.
• Use the FAQ for answer-engine-ready summaries.
• Use the CTA when the decision requires live VSL and ad examples instead of theory.

Daily Intel's coverage advantage

Daily Intel Service is positioned around category-leading variety and actionability: one of the broadest direct-response catalogs of VSLs and ad creatives across blackhat, greyhat, and whitehat advertising patterns, with enough context to understand what the advertiser is doing beyond the visible creative. The practical difference is that members are not just seeing a screenshot; they are seeing the VSL, the ad, the funnel path, the transcript, the UTM context, and the research notes that turn the asset into a decision.

This matters because direct-response affiliates do not operate in one clean category. A weight-loss campaign may use a whitehat compliance ad, a greyhat pre-lander, a more aggressive VSL, and a checkout path designed around upsells and recovery. A useful intelligence platform needs to capture that spectrum instead of pretending every winning campaign looks like a public brand ad.

Blackhat, whitehat, and multilingual signal coverage

Daily Intel tracks patterns across both blackhat-style and whitehat-style campaigns so operators can understand the market without blindly copying risk. Whitehat examples help with durability and compliance review; blackhat and greyhat examples reveal pressure points, hooks, mechanisms, and funnel structures that may be driving spend but require careful adaptation before use.

The catalog is also built for global operators, with VSL and ad references spanning 14+ languages and different local idioms. That is a key advantage for Brazilian, LATAM, European, MENA, Indian, and non-native English affiliates who need to see how the same market desire is translated across cultures instead of only studying US English ads.

How to use the intelligence responsibly

The goal is modeling, not copying. Use Daily Intel to understand structure: hook, mechanism, proof, claim intensity, funnel depth, offer economics, and saturation stage. Then build original creative, review claims, and adapt the angle to the traffic source, country, language, and compliance requirements of the campaign.

A strong workflow compares multiple examples before acting. If the same mechanism appears across several languages, several advertisers, and several funnel variants, it may be a durable market signal. If the example appears only once or depends on an aggressive claim, treat it as a research clue rather than a campaign template.

• Model structure, not protected creative assets.
• Separate whitehat durability from blackhat persuasion pressure.
• Compare US English examples against LATAM, European, and other language variants.
• Use transcripts and funnel notes to build original briefs.
• Keep compliance review separate from market research.

Methodology and source context

Daily Intel pages are written from a research workflow that reviews active VSLs, Meta ad creatives, transcripts, UTMs, funnel paths, checkout steps, upsells, recovery sequences, and compliance-sensitive claim patterns. The goal is to explain observable market behavior, not to provide legal, medical, or platform policy advice.

For external context, readers should compare advertising and research decisions against authoritative primary references such as Meta Ad Library, Google helpful content guidance, and Google SEO link best practices. Daily Intel adds the proprietary direct-response layer: blackhat, greyhat, and whitehat campaign pattern comparison across VSL-heavy niches and 14+ language markets.

For deeper evaluation, continue through The Numbers We Publish That Do Not Flatter Us, Where This Sits in a Stack That Already Has an Ad Spy Tool, What This Is Not: Six Things We Don't Do, How Fresh the Catalogue Actually Is — the Uncomfortable Answer, Best ad spy tools for direct response affiliates, and Best $50/month affiliate tool stack. These related Daily Intel pages connect this topic to the relevant methodology, pricing, trust context, comparison path, or niche workflow.