AdPlexity Is Six Products, Not One Subscription

which six products does adplexity sell?

AdPlexity sells six separately licensed products: Native, Desktop, Mobile, Adult, Push and Social. Each one is its own subscription, its own price and its own login, not a tier inside a shared plan. That structure is spelled out on AdPlexity's pricing page, which shows six product cards side by side rather than one plan with feature gates.

Native, Desktop and Mobile map roughly to the traffic format their names describe, while Adult names a vertical and Push names a notification format. Social is the least documented of the six — AdPlexity's own site lists it as a product without describing what it indexes or what it costs.

• Native — native-ad networks and landing-page keyword search, built for affiliate and direct-response buyers
• Desktop — desktop web ad formats
• Mobile — mobile web ad formats
• Adult — adult-vertical ad inventory
• Push — push-notification ad networks
• Social — listed as a product, with no description or price published alongside it

what does each one cost monthly and billed yearly?

Native costs the most at $249/month, or $208/month billed yearly. Desktop, Mobile and Adult each run $199/month ($166 billed yearly), and Push is the cheapest priced product at $149/month ($124 billed yearly). Social carries no listed monthly or yearly figure on the pricing page.

Treat these numbers as a snapshot checked in August 2026. Product pricing pages across this niche change without notice, so confirm the live figure before you subscribe rather than budgeting off a page you read months ago.

which module has no published price?

Social is the module with no published price. AdPlexity's pricing page lists Social as the sixth product alongside Native, Desktop, Mobile, Adult and Push, but at the time of checking in August 2026, no monthly or yearly figure rendered next to it — a gap in the page itself, not a symptom of how it was read.

That gap belongs in the needs-confirmation bucket, not the safe-to-estimate one. Given Push sits at $149/month and Native at $249/month, a reasonable range for Social probably falls somewhere inside that band, but that's a guess about where AdPlexity might price it, not a figure anyone has published. Book the demo referenced on AdPlexity's Native product page and get the number directly before you budget for it.

what does a two-module combination cost?

Two modules cost the simple sum of their individual prices — AdPlexity publishes no shared rate for buying across products. Native plus Push runs $398/month on monthly billing, or $332/month if both are billed yearly ($208 plus $124). Desktop plus Mobile lands at the identical $398/month monthly figure and the identical $332/month yearly figure, since both products share the $199/$166 price point.

Whatever combination you pick, the module fee is only one line in the budget. The bigger decision is how you split test dollars across the ad sets and campaigns you build from what you find in either database, which is worth planning before checkout rather than after — see our breakdown of ad sets, ads, and dollars for a first campaign for a starting structure.

does buying more modules earn any published discount?

No published discount rewards buying multiple modules together. The only discount AdPlexity states anywhere is the per-product annual-billing rate, and it applies whether you buy one module or all six. Native's annual rate is described on the pricing page as a 20% discount, though $208 is roughly 16.5% below $249 on the raw numbers; the two figures don't quite reconcile, and we report both rather than pick the flattering one.

The unbundling looks like nickel-and-dime pricing at first glance, but it arguably works in favor of a narrow buyer: someone running push traffic only pays $149/month, rather than being folded into a single all-access subscription priced to also cover Native's larger, pricier dataset. A buyer working one vertical pays for one vertical, not five they'll never query.

does the refund window run separately per module?

Yes, the refund window runs separately per module, because each module is its own subscription. AdPlexity's refund policy requires a request 'within 2 days of your subscription start date,' and with six separately purchased products, each purchase carries its own start date and its own two-day clock, per AdPlexity's refund policy page.

That policy also excludes refunds for problems AdPlexity attributes to circumstances beyond its control, including personal-circumstance changes and third-party hardware or software failures, and states that approval sits at 'the sole discretion of AdIntelligence Limited,' the legal entity behind AdPlexity. Budget for the possibility that a gap discovered on day three of a Push subscription falls outside the refund window entirely.

which module covers the traffic you actually buy?

Match the module to the traffic you're buying, not the vertical you're selling. Native covers native ad networks — its own product page describes keyword search across landing pages and ad content, plus filtering by affiliate network (naming MediaForce, ClickBank and BuyGoods), publisher (Outbrain, Taboola, MGID) and arbitrage network (Tonic, Sedo). Push covers push-notification networks. Desktop and Mobile split by device rather than by network name, and Adult layers a vertical filter on top of whichever formats it indexes.

None of the six modules is built for Meta or Google inventory specifically, at least not according to what AdPlexity's own product pages describe. If your traffic budget runs through Facebook or Instagram, a module named for a different traffic format won't show you the ads you're actually competing against, no matter how complete AdPlexity's other databases are.

what does the equivalent coverage cost as a single bundle elsewhere?

A comparable two-category bundle costs less elsewhere, though not with matching coverage. Anstrex prices a combined Native + Push plan at $139.99/month per user, and its three-product 'Ultimate Combo' (Native, Push and Pops) at $219.99/month per user — both well under AdPlexity's $398/month for Native plus Push alone, per Anstrex's Native product page.

The catch is coverage, not just price. Anstrex says outright in its own FAQ that it doesn't index Facebook ads, and it has no Desktop, Mobile or Adult product to set against AdPlexity's remaining three modules. A buyer choosing on price alone saves money with Anstrex's bundle; a buyer who specifically needs AdPlexity's Adult or Desktop coverage has no bundled alternative to compare it to.

Quick decision checklist

Use this page as a decision aid, not a generic blog post. The practical question is whether the reader needs faster evidence about what is already working in VSL-driven direct response, especially across nutra, supplements, GLP-1, weight loss, blood sugar, and adjacent high-intent health markets.

Daily Intel Service is most relevant when the next decision depends on active market examples: which hook to test, which claim style is risky, which funnel structure is common, which language market is moving, and whether a competitor's creative is likely early, scaling, or already saturated.

• Start with the TL;DR if you need the direct answer.
• Use the table to compare trade-offs quickly.
• Use the FAQ for answer-engine-ready summaries.
• Use the CTA when the decision requires live VSL and ad examples instead of theory.

Daily Intel's coverage advantage

Daily Intel Service is positioned around category-leading variety and actionability: one of the broadest direct-response catalogs of VSLs and ad creatives across blackhat, greyhat, and whitehat advertising patterns, with enough context to understand what the advertiser is doing beyond the visible creative. The practical difference is that members are not just seeing a screenshot; they are seeing the VSL, the ad, the funnel path, the transcript, the UTM context, and the research notes that turn the asset into a decision.

This matters because direct-response affiliates do not operate in one clean category. A weight-loss campaign may use a whitehat compliance ad, a greyhat pre-lander, a more aggressive VSL, and a checkout path designed around upsells and recovery. A useful intelligence platform needs to capture that spectrum instead of pretending every winning campaign looks like a public brand ad.

Blackhat, whitehat, and multilingual signal coverage

Daily Intel tracks patterns across both blackhat-style and whitehat-style campaigns so operators can understand the market without blindly copying risk. Whitehat examples help with durability and compliance review; blackhat and greyhat examples reveal pressure points, hooks, mechanisms, and funnel structures that may be driving spend but require careful adaptation before use.

The catalog is also built for global operators, with VSL and ad references spanning 14+ languages and different local idioms. That is a key advantage for Brazilian, LATAM, European, MENA, Indian, and non-native English affiliates who need to see how the same market desire is translated across cultures instead of only studying US English ads.

How to use the intelligence responsibly

The goal is modeling, not copying. Use Daily Intel to understand structure: hook, mechanism, proof, claim intensity, funnel depth, offer economics, and saturation stage. Then build original creative, review claims, and adapt the angle to the traffic source, country, language, and compliance requirements of the campaign.

A strong workflow compares multiple examples before acting. If the same mechanism appears across several languages, several advertisers, and several funnel variants, it may be a durable market signal. If the example appears only once or depends on an aggressive claim, treat it as a research clue rather than a campaign template.

• Model structure, not protected creative assets.
• Separate whitehat durability from blackhat persuasion pressure.
• Compare US English examples against LATAM, European, and other language variants.
• Use transcripts and funnel notes to build original briefs.
• Keep compliance review separate from market research.

Methodology and source context

Daily Intel pages are written from a research workflow that reviews active VSLs, Meta ad creatives, transcripts, UTMs, funnel paths, checkout steps, upsells, recovery sequences, and compliance-sensitive claim patterns. The goal is to explain observable market behavior, not to provide legal, medical, or platform policy advice.

For external context, readers should compare advertising and research decisions against authoritative primary references such as Meta Ad Library, Google helpful content guidance, and Google SEO link best practices. Daily Intel adds the proprietary direct-response layer: blackhat, greyhat, and whitehat campaign pattern comparison across VSL-heavy niches and 14+ language markets.

For deeper evaluation, continue through Ad spy comparison hub, AdPlexity vs AdHeart: Buy Traffic Sources or Buy Meta Depth, Foreplay vs BigSpy: A Community Library Against a Crawled One, Anstrex Alternatives: What Else Covers Native, Push and Pop, BigSpy Alternatives: Leaving the Quota That Doesn't Reset, and Best $50/month affiliate tool stack. These related Daily Intel pages connect this topic to the relevant methodology, pricing, trust context, comparison path, or niche workflow.