ClickBank Is 1,393 of 28,042 Offers Here — What the Other Ten Networks Carry

What share of the catalogue does ClickBank actually represent?

ClickBank holds 1,393 of the 28,042 active offers in this catalogue, a share just under 5% (listing_offers joined to listing_networks, direct count). That number surprises operators who learned affiliate marketing entirely inside ClickBank's dashboard, because the network functions as a front door to the industry, not the industry itself. Eleven networks currently carry live offers here, and ClickBank ranks seventh by volume among them.

The remaining 95% splits across ten other affiliate and producer networks, several of which most English-language buyers have never opened an account with. If you've built every campaign around gravity scores and marketplace tracking, finding which ClickBank offers are about to scale is still worth doing — ClickBank's small share doesn't make it a weak network, only a narrow slice of where offer volume actually sits.

This distribution reflects a live count, not a locked-in one. Networks add and prune offers continuously, and only 274 of the 28,042 offers here were re-confirmed by a scrape in the last 30 days. Read the percentages on this page as the catalogue's shape rather than as today's exact snapshot; the underlying networks move faster than any single table can be labeled current.

Which networks carry more offers than ClickBank does here?

Six networks carry more offers than ClickBank in this catalogue: Braip, Hotmart Affiliation, Kiwify, Hotmart, Admitad and Monetizze all outrank it by raw count (listing_offers joined to listing_networks, direct count). Four networks fall below ClickBank — CPALead, BuyGoods, MyLead and dr.cash — and two configured networks, Digistore24 and TerraLeads, currently carry zero offers at all.

Braip alone carries more offers than ClickBank, CPALead, BuyGoods, MyLead and dr.cash combined. That single fact reframes what the affiliate industry actually looks like once you stop reading it through one marketplace's dashboard.

What kinds of offers live on producer platforms instead?

Producer platforms like Braip, Hotmart and Kiwify list digital courses, coaching programs and software the creator sells directly, with the affiliate network wrapped around the checkout rather than sitting between merchant and buyer as a separate marketplace. That structural difference explains the volume: a producer platform accumulates every course launch in its home market, while ClickBank accumulates only the sellers who chose to list there specifically.

These offers span 25 distinct verticals and 79 distinct geo codes in this catalogue, and 25,293 of the 28,042 offers carry at least one geo target (listing_offers table, direct count). Coverage that wide is exactly what the ad-spy tools built for this niche don't track — they index ad creatives, not a structured offer catalogue with payout, vertical and geo attached as filterable fields, and none of them names Hotmart, Braip, Kiwify or Monetizze anywhere in its stated coverage despite those four accounting for a large share of the offers cataloged here.

How does approval differ across these networks?

Approval works differently depending on whether the network is a marketplace or a producer platform, though this catalogue doesn't carry verified approval-time or approval-rate data for any of the eleven. ClickBank has historically let most affiliates browse and promote without a per-offer application, while CPA-style networks such as CPALead, MyLead and dr.cash typically gate individual offers behind an application the affiliate submits after signup.

Brazilian producer platforms tend to sit in between: account-level signup is usually open, but some offers still require the producer's own approval before an affiliate link goes live. Treat any specific claim about approval speed or rejection rate on a given network as something to confirm directly with that network before you build a campaign around it — this catalogue tracks offer records, not application outcomes.

Which of these networks are reachable from outside their home market?

Admitad, CPALead, MyLead, dr.cash and ClickBank operate as international networks first, while Braip, Hotmart, Kiwify and Monetizze are reachable from outside Brazil but were built around Brazilian and broader LATAM producers and audiences. An affiliate outside that region can sign up for any of them, but a large share of the offer copy, VSL scripts and landing pages sit in Portuguese, which is a real operating cost even where the network itself imposes no geographic block.

Raw offer count is a poor proxy for how easy a network actually is to run if you buy media in English. Braip's 7,574 offers outnumber ClickBank's 1,393 by more than five to one, but an English-only buyer will find a much smaller working set on Braip once language-matched creative narrows the field. If you're specifically hunting outside Brazil, Hotmart offers built for affiliates working outside Brazil is the narrower list worth starting from instead of the full Hotmart catalogue.

What changes in the commission model when you leave ClickBank?

Commission structure shifts from ClickBank's typical percentage-of-sale model toward a mix of fixed CPA and revenue-share once you look at the other ten networks in this catalogue. Of the full 28,042 offers, 15,582 carry a numeric CPA or commission amount recorded directly in the offer, which makes payout a field you can filter and sort rather than a number you dig out of a vendor's affiliate page (listing_offers.cpa_amount_numeric, direct count).

CPALead, MyLead and dr.cash lean toward fixed CPA payouts per lead or action. Braip, Hotmart, Kiwify and Monetizze lean toward percentage revenue share on the sale price, and Admitad runs both models depending on the advertiser. That mix matters for cash-flow planning: a fixed CPA offer pays the same whether the buyer purchases a $19 upsell or a $997 course, while a revenue-share offer scales with the vendor's price point and any upsell path behind it.

Which verticals are better served away from ClickBank?

Health, biohacking and physician-adjacent verticals are better represented on producer and CPA networks than on ClickBank inside this catalogue, spanning some of the 25 verticals tracked across all 28,042 offers. Peptide-adjacent offers in particular sit closer to compliance lines ClickBank enforces strictly, and what's actually running in peptide affiliate offers right now draws mostly from networks with different vendor-approval standards than ClickBank's.

Spirituality and self-help remain a vertical where ClickBank still competes on offer depth rather than volume alone. Its marketplace built a reputation there over two decades that producer platforms haven't matched offer-for-offer, and ClickBank's spirituality offers worth promoting in 2026 is still a reasonable starting list for that specific niche. ClickBank isn't behind everywhere — it's behind on volume and ahead on a small number of verticals it has run the longest.

What does a diversified offer shortlist look like?

A diversified shortlist pulls from at least three networks with different commission models and different home markets, not just the one you already have login credentials for. Pair a ClickBank offer that carries a numeric commission field with a producer-platform offer from Braip or Hotmart in a vertical with strong geo coverage, then add a CPA offer from CPALead or MyLead priced per lead rather than per sale. Three different payout mechanics hedges against any single network changing terms.

Before you commit media spend, run the shortlist through a straight side-by-side of terms rather than assuming one network's structure applies everywhere: comparing all eight networks side by side is built for exactly that gap-check. Offer description depth is uneven across this catalogue too — 8,668 of the 28,042 offers carry a long description over 300 characters, 632 carry a shorter one, and 18,742 carry none (listing_offers.long_description, direct count) — so a thin-looking listing isn't necessarily a thin offer, only a thin catalogue note worth checking against the vendor page directly.

Quick decision checklist

Use this page as a decision aid, not a generic blog post. The practical question is whether the reader needs faster evidence about what is already working in VSL-driven direct response, especially across nutra, supplements, GLP-1, weight loss, blood sugar, and adjacent high-intent health markets.

Daily Intel Service is most relevant when the next decision depends on active market examples: which hook to test, which claim style is risky, which funnel structure is common, which language market is moving, and whether a competitor's creative is likely early, scaling, or already saturated.

• Start with the TL;DR if you need the direct answer.
• Use the table to compare trade-offs quickly.
• Use the FAQ for answer-engine-ready summaries.
• Use the CTA when the decision requires live VSL and ad examples instead of theory.

Daily Intel's coverage advantage

Daily Intel Service is positioned around category-leading variety and actionability: one of the broadest direct-response catalogs of VSLs and ad creatives across blackhat, greyhat, and whitehat advertising patterns, with enough context to understand what the advertiser is doing beyond the visible creative. The practical difference is that members are not just seeing a screenshot; they are seeing the VSL, the ad, the funnel path, the transcript, the UTM context, and the research notes that turn the asset into a decision.

This matters because direct-response affiliates do not operate in one clean category. A weight-loss campaign may use a whitehat compliance ad, a greyhat pre-lander, a more aggressive VSL, and a checkout path designed around upsells and recovery. A useful intelligence platform needs to capture that spectrum instead of pretending every winning campaign looks like a public brand ad.

Blackhat, whitehat, and multilingual signal coverage

Daily Intel tracks patterns across both blackhat-style and whitehat-style campaigns so operators can understand the market without blindly copying risk. Whitehat examples help with durability and compliance review; blackhat and greyhat examples reveal pressure points, hooks, mechanisms, and funnel structures that may be driving spend but require careful adaptation before use.

The catalog is also built for global operators, with VSL and ad references spanning 14+ languages and different local idioms. That is a key advantage for Brazilian, LATAM, European, MENA, Indian, and non-native English affiliates who need to see how the same market desire is translated across cultures instead of only studying US English ads.

How to use the intelligence responsibly

The goal is modeling, not copying. Use Daily Intel to understand structure: hook, mechanism, proof, claim intensity, funnel depth, offer economics, and saturation stage. Then build original creative, review claims, and adapt the angle to the traffic source, country, language, and compliance requirements of the campaign.

A strong workflow compares multiple examples before acting. If the same mechanism appears across several languages, several advertisers, and several funnel variants, it may be a durable market signal. If the example appears only once or depends on an aggressive claim, treat it as a research clue rather than a campaign template.

• Model structure, not protected creative assets.
• Separate whitehat durability from blackhat persuasion pressure.
• Compare US English examples against LATAM, European, and other language variants.
• Use transcripts and funnel notes to build original briefs.
• Keep compliance review separate from market research.

Methodology and source context

Daily Intel pages are written from a research workflow that reviews active VSLs, Meta ad creatives, transcripts, UTMs, funnel paths, checkout steps, upsells, recovery sequences, and compliance-sensitive claim patterns. The goal is to explain observable market behavior, not to provide legal, medical, or platform policy advice.

For external context, readers should compare advertising and research decisions against authoritative primary references such as Meta Ad Library, Google helpful content guidance, and Google SEO link best practices. Daily Intel adds the proprietary direct-response layer: blackhat, greyhat, and whitehat campaign pattern comparison across VSL-heavy niches and 14+ language markets.

For deeper evaluation, continue through What Changes When Offer Terms Become Fields Instead of Prose, Same Vertical, Four Networks: Where the Payout Actually Differs, Entering a New Vertical: Read the Offers Before You Read the Ads, Why No Ad Spy Tool Can Tell You What an Offer Pays, Best ad spy tools for direct response affiliates, and Best $50/month affiliate tool stack. These related Daily Intel pages connect this topic to the relevant methodology, pricing, trust context, comparison path, or niche workflow.